Shifting the Balance: 6 Ways to Bring the Science of Reading into the Balanced Literacy Classroom

Shifting the Balance: 6 Ways to Bring the Science of Reading into the Balanced Literacy Classroom

  • Downloads:2269
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-04-28 08:51:35
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Jan Burkins
  • ISBN:1625315104
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

These days, it seems that everyone has a strong opinion about how to teach young children to read。 Some may brush off the current tension as nothing more than one more round of “the reading wars。” Others may avoid the clash altogether due to the uncivilized discourse that sometimes results。 Certainly, sorting the signal from the noise is no easy task。

In this leading-edge book, authors Jan Burkins and Kari Yates address this tension as a critical opportunity to look closely at the research, reevaluate current practices, and embrace new possibilities for an even stronger enactment of balanced literacy。

From phonological processing to brain research to orthographic mapping to self-teaching hypothesis, Shifting the Balance cuts through the rhetoric (and the sciencey science) to offer readers a practical guide to decision-making about beginning reading instruction。 The authors honor the balanced literacy perspective while highlighting common practices to reconsider and revise—all through a lens of what’s best for the students sitting in front of us。
 
Across six shifts, each chapter


identifies a common instructional practice to reconsider
explores various misunderstandings that establish and keep that practice in play
shares scientific research to support its reconsideration
proposes an instructional shift to apply a new perspective, and
details several high-leverage instructional routines to support implementation of that shift。
By pinpointing gaps and overlaps—as well as common misunderstandings and missed opportunities between the competing lines of thought—Jan and Kari offer busy educators direction and clarification for integrating science and balance into their daily instruction, while keeping meaningful experiences with text a priority。

Download

Reviews

Leigh Martella

Overall, this book seems like it was written by balanced literacy apologists and there are several red flags that show a lack of understanding of the science of reading and literacy in general。 I do take some issue with some of their word choice, and there are some misrepresentations, like with the role phonological lexicons and orthographic processors play, the assertion that phonemes are meaningless。 They also get some syllabification wrong by conflating spoken and written syllabification。The Overall, this book seems like it was written by balanced literacy apologists and there are several red flags that show a lack of understanding of the science of reading and literacy in general。 I do take some issue with some of their word choice, and there are some misrepresentations, like with the role phonological lexicons and orthographic processors play, the assertion that phonemes are meaningless。 They also get some syllabification wrong by conflating spoken and written syllabification。The biggest red flag is Shift 5, which is all about how to use the three-cueing system and how the three-cueing system aligns with the Simple View of Reading。 There's even a graphic wherein they visually equate the three-cueing system to the SVR。 I could see this book being a good avenue for some teachers to access theoretical models and parts of the SoR, because it appeals to people who feel emotional or upset by the "SoR bullies" (not their term, but they might as well have said it)。 It also will appeal to people who still use the three-cueing system and uphold its efficacy。 However, there is nothing in this book that isn't covered better by other people in a better way。 。。。more

Marie

My school district is currently transitioning from Balanced Literacy to The Science of Reading。 It has been a hard transition as many of the teachers and admin have been trained completely in Balanced Literacy and find a lot of value in it。 This book was so respectful towards teachers whose background is Balanced Literacy! There was no shaming or passive-aggressive commentary。 Instead, the authors took real-life scenarios in a Balanced Literacy classroom and highlighted manageable and fairly sim My school district is currently transitioning from Balanced Literacy to The Science of Reading。 It has been a hard transition as many of the teachers and admin have been trained completely in Balanced Literacy and find a lot of value in it。 This book was so respectful towards teachers whose background is Balanced Literacy! There was no shaming or passive-aggressive commentary。 Instead, the authors took real-life scenarios in a Balanced Literacy classroom and highlighted manageable and fairly simple changes that could be made to shift to a Science of Reading classroom。 Ultimately, all teachers want to do what's best for their students and I feel like this book really honored that。 It was an easy read that was well-researched and gave lots of great ideas and information! 。。。more

Heather White

I was so curious about this book and how the authors were planning to blend these two disparate ideas。 In the end, every shift they suggest is rooted in research and best practice already。 It made me hopeful that maybe we, as a literacy community, can stop picking sides and just support best practice instead of this either/or division we have going on right now。 We can have systematic phonological and phonics instruction within a balance literacy framework。

Michele Hanner

A soft landing for introducing the brain work behind learning to read。 Take steps to bridge current practices with research in learning to read。

Tia

Not what I thought Disappointed。 If getting your money back for books was a thing I would be first in line。 Don't waste time。 Not what I thought Disappointed。 If getting your money back for books was a thing I would be first in line。 Don't waste time。 。。。more